Construction and Engineering
Construction disputes involving contract validity, payment, delay, quality and project delivery.
A specific strategy depends on the documents and procedural stage
Matters within the same broad category can differ substantially in their legal basis, evidence, limitation periods, jurisdiction, available asset information and procedural posture. The website therefore does not assume that one standard route is suitable for every matter.
Discuss a specific matter →- Do the contract, variation and final-account records form a coherent evidence chain?
- How should the claimant, scope and legal basis of a construction-payment claim be identified?
- Can responsibility for delay and quality be allocated through contemporaneous project records?
Construction questions and case analysis
These published case analyses address jurisdiction, payment conditions and fixed-price settlement. The summaries describe individual cases; read the facts and reasoning before applying them to a different matter.
入库案例：公路桥上跨铁路，应由铁路运输法院管辖吗？
公路桥虽上跨铁路，但不属于铁路及其附属设施、也不服务于铁路运输的，不适用铁路运输法院专门管辖。
入库案例：工程已验收且质保期届满，总包能否仍以业主未付款拒付？
工程已经竣工验收、质保期届满，而总包不能证明业主延期付款的，背靠背条款不能成为其无限期拒付分包款的理由。
入库案例：固定总价工程未完工，应如何结算？
固定价合同项下未完工程，可以按已完工程占约定工程范围的比例折算价款。
Updated:
General information only. A strategy for a particular matter depends on its documents, limitation periods, jurisdiction and procedural posture.